Bitcoin closes at $78,936: the range held
También disponible en español →
Every Sunday the BitPulse model commits to a range for the following week, in public and before the fact. The one that just expired said $76,127-$80,373; the market answered with a close at $78,936, inside it.

The week, from open to close
Bitcoin traded between a weekly low of $75,546 and a high of $81,273, and finished +2.4% from Monday's open. The number that settles the range is the close, and this week the close was $78,936.
Measured against the centre of the projected band, that landed +0.9% away. The verdict: inside the band.
A quiet week, which is also information
Now the part most readers skip. 2.4% across seven days is a quiet week by Bitcoin standards, and quiet weeks are the ones nobody writes about. They are also the majority of them.
That matters for anyone trying to judge a model, because a forecast only gets tested properly across the boring stretches as well as the dramatic ones. Publishing the flat weeks is how the log stays honest instead of becoming a highlight reel.
What the width of the band says about Bitcoin volatility
The band is 5.4% wide between its edges. That single figure is the model stating, in advance, how much weekly movement it considered ordinary for Bitcoin right now. Wider bands mean the engine sees a jumpier market; narrower ones mean it is willing to commit.
It is a more useful reading than it looks, because it is the part of a forecast that people usually skip. A narrow band that holds is a real result. A wide band that holds proves very little, and the width is published precisely so nobody has to take the hit rate at face value.
Stock to flow, the rainbow chart and other absentees
One layer deeper. Worth being explicit, because the most searched Bitcoin models are not in this engine. There is no stock to flow here and no rainbow chart. Both are readable, both are popular, and both have spent the last cycle being argued about precisely because they were published as certainties and then had to be quietly re-drawn.
The power law is in, as one of the four generators, and it earns its place by being reweighted against real history every week rather than by looking convincing on a chart. Leaving the famous models out is not a dig at them. It is the same standard applied here: if a component cannot be scored against what actually happened, it does not get to move the band.
Frozen in advance, on purpose
Zoom out for a second. This range was emitted on August 22, 2026 and resolves against the weekly close of August 29, 2026. Those two dates are not decoration. They are what separates a forecast from a comment, because once the first one passes the number cannot be edited.
Almost nobody in this corner of the internet publishes their errors. That is not a moral failing, it is an incentive: an unmarked forecast is always right in hindsight. The full record, including the ranges that missed, is public and dated, and it can be read as data rather than taken on trust.
Day 863 of the Bitcoin halving cycle
Counting days since the April 2024 halving puts this piece on day 863. The next halving is estimated by block height for February 6, 2028, a date that drifts with the real cadence of mined blocks rather than sitting on a calendar.
That count is the honest way to compare cycles, because what matters is not the date but how far in we are. It is also worth saying plainly that four halvings means four cases. Enough to see a shape, nowhere near enough to prove one, and whether the four year cycle still holds is an argument that is very much open. The cycle is context here, never the reason for a weekly number.
Why this is not a Bitcoin price prediction
Set the price aside for a moment. Search for a Bitcoin price prediction and you will find a single number with a date attached and no way to check it later. This is the other thing. The band from $76,127 to $80,373 says where the model thinks price is more likely than not to land, it says so before the fact, and it gets marked against the real close afterwards.
The distinction is the same one a weather forecast makes. Nobody promises rain at four in the afternoon; they give you a probability and you decide what to do with the umbrella. A Bitcoin price target promises certainty that nobody has. A forecast hands you the odds and keeps the receipt.
What the public log says so far
7 of the 9 projected weekly ranges published so far resolved inside the band. Every one of them was frozen before its week, and every result went up afterwards, including the ones that went wrong.
There is a trap in that number worth naming. A band that contains the close every single time is not a good model, it is a wide one. The published band is the middle half of the distribution, so a properly calibrated engine should land inside about half the time. A hit rate far above that means the bands are wider than they should be, which is a miscalibration too, just the flattering kind.
How far Bitcoin travelled to get nowhere
Context first, verdict after. Between the weekly low of $75,546 and the high of $81,273 there is 7.6% of ground, and the close ended 2.9% below the top of that span. The drawdown from the week's high is the number that tends to be felt rather than read.
Ranges are resolved on the close, not on the wick, and the two can tell very different stories. A week can spend days outside the band and still settle inside it, which is why the log records one number and not the most dramatic one available.
The Bitcoin model behind the range
Now the part most readers skip. The band is not one forecast dressed up as a range. It comes out of a combined engine of four models (a power law over a decade of price history, a Monte Carlo simulation driven by GARCH volatility, an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck residual model and an implied density read from the Deribit options surface), pooled and reweighted every week against real history. Each one is wrong in its own way, which is the point: pooling them cancels part of the error that any single Bitcoin model carries alone.
Around fourteen live data sources feed the bias layer on top, among them MVRV-Z, SOPR, NUPL, the Puell multiple, Reserve Risk, the Bitcoin realized price, funding rates and global liquidity. What comes out is a distribution of thousands of simulated price paths, and the published band is its middle half, from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Roughly one path in two ends inside it.
The next number is already live
The next projected range is drawn over the live Bitcoin chart in the app, alongside the dated zones for the longer horizons, and it is recalculated on the server every day so that every visitor sees the same numbers. Nothing here is computed in your browser and nothing is personalised.
None of this is investment advice. It is one statistical model keeping its numbers where anybody can check them, including the weeks it gets wrong.
Frequently asked questions
Did Bitcoin close the week inside the projected range?
Yes. The range published in advance ran from $76,127 to $80,373 and the Bitcoin weekly close was $78,936, inside the band. The result joins the public track record either way.
How is the Bitcoin range calculated?
With a combined engine of four models: a power law over a decade of price history, a Monte Carlo simulation driven by GARCH volatility, an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck residual model and an implied density read from the Deribit options surface. They are pooled into one distribution and reweighted every week against real history, with around fourteen live data sources feeding a bias layer on top. The published band is its middle half, frozen before the period starts so it cannot be adjusted after the fact.
Where is Bitcoin in its market cycle?
Day 863 since the last halving. The model uses that position as one of its signals, alongside recent volatility and the long-term trend.